Sports INDIANAPOLIS — Let’s recount relating to the strangest standoff I’m able to connect in mind in rather some time masking the league.
NFL Scouting Mix week is winding down from a media point of view, which is continually an ironic transition. The reporters that flock here to community and rating info typically beginning up bailing out of town on Thursday and Friday, which is the true time the on-discipline exercises which would per chance be the trigger of the tournament — on paper, anyway — rating started at Lucas Oil Stadium.
There’ll be time to concern relating to the incoming draft class later. Because in the convention rooms, espresso outlets and bars of Indianapolis, there is hobby in handiest one title: Matthew Stafford.
The vulnerable quarterback has grow to be the largest resolve in the NFL this week, as the Rams have granted him permission to recount with other groups about his market and what his providers and products would per chance be price. That, in flip, has spark off a storm of speculation about who would per chance be intelligent to not appropriate pay Stafford a hefty novel contract, nonetheless switch essential capital to rating him from Los Angeles.
Or not it’s all very intriguing, as switch speculation tends to be. Or not it’s additionally downright advanced, on legend of for the existence of me I’m able to’t resolve out the intention in which it makes sense.
Per chance I have to not be bowled over Stafford has grow to be the well-known and most impactful domino waiting to tumble in this 2025 offseason. He told me himself proper by intention of Sizable Bowl week that he had determined to play this upcoming season, and he even acknowledged that he wasn’t definite the establish aside he’d high-tail well with up. Those are the realities of turning 37 earlier this month and having a 2025 salary cap hit of roughly $49.7 million on the books.
Smooth, as lately as final week, it felt not doubtless that something would not rating performed to withhold Stafford in L.A. Starting quarterbacks typically switch groups handiest when their salaries outpace their performance, or when the direction toward contention looks bleak.
Neither of these portray Stafford, who battled by intention of shatter to put up his handiest passer rating in three years and info a younger Rams squad to the playoffs. And, as all of us attach in mind, Stafford had the Rams 13 yards from potentially info superhighway web hosting the NFC Championship Sport forward of Jalen Carter delivered doubtlessly the most snatch play of the postseason to withhold the eventual champion Eagles’ season alive.
So, if the Rams had been a play or two away from but every other legit speed on the Sizable Bowl, is money an ethical adequate reason to fade off their quarterback? Monday, I did not mediate so. On the present time, I’m not so determined.
That’s what occurs when you happen to let quarterback-needy groups into the combo, as the Rams have performed by opening the door for these conversations.
On the time, it felt like sound switch system to come abet up with an acceptable number for a novel contract. The Ravens did something an identical about a years ago by tagging Lamar Jackson, permitting other groups to convey the parameters for a long-time duration deal that he in the extinguish signed in Baltimore. Greater to let any individual else strike up a advice you can match than assert against your self.
Except that external offer blows away the expectations, which can also very well happen here. The league published Thursday that the salary cap has jumped but every other $24 million (to a legend $279.2 million) for the arriving season. We’ve written endless words already about how disappointing this draft class of incoming quarterbacks is as in contrast to fresh years.
In a world the establish aside nine quarterbacks are making north of $50 million per year, it makes sense if a desperate team throws the monetary institution at a vulnerable quarterback able to main a Sizable Bowl speed — which is precisely what’s going down, as groups like the Giants and Raiders have expressed “essential hobby” in Stafford. If both team is intelligent to pay a salary that would per chance well blow previous his latest sensible of $40 million, the Rams would per chance well need no different nonetheless to alter him.
With all that context in mind, I’m appropriate not determined how we came.
Stafford has delivered the entirety the Rams can also have per chance dreamed of after they purchased him in a blockbuster quarterback swap four years ago. He has won 34 games, thrown 95 touchdowns, reached the playoffs three instances and hung a Sizable Bowl banner for a franchise that desperately needed to search out a foothold in a crowded L.A. market. He’s additionally in the twilight of his profession and not in worthy of a establish aside to begin over.
Form not rating me flawed, Stafford would rating a difference in Fresh York or Las Vegas. Or not it’s very stress-free to imagine him throwing to Malik Nabers or Brock Bowers, and both groups have a high-10 draft pick they’d (presumably) refuse to part with in any switch. The Raiders and Giants can also rating themselves competitive with Stafford in a speed.
Is it adequate, though? Can the Giants in actuality remake themselves from the worst team in the NFC to a contender forward of Stafford’s profession winds down? Is Stafford in truth going to be the reason the Raiders continue to exist the quarterback fingers speed that is the AFC?
Are both of these eventualities an improvement on Stafford’s latest convey of affairs, with an ascending Rams team that is incessantly a portion or two away from but every other championship speed?
It feels unlikely, especially with the clock ticking on Stafford’s profession. And as long as we’re doing a deep dive on this, or not it’s price mentioning the legacy assert of it.
Heaps of of us mediate Stafford already has a case for the Pro Football Hall of Popularity. He doesn’t have the All-Pro and even Pro Bowl nods you’d demand from an enshrinee, nonetheless he’s Tenth all time in both passing yards and passing touchdowns, and he does have one all-crucial Sizable Bowl get. Any other solid season or two can also watch him climb as high as fifth in yards and sixth in touchdowns. Any other championship would rating him appropriate the 14th quarterback to get more than one Sizable Bowls. That, blended alongside with his particular particular person numbers, sounds like adequate to reach the Hall.
Making the flawed different here would have ramifications that final so a lot longer than how many yards Stafford throws for in 2025.
That applies appropriate as worthy to the Rams, obviously. No longer that overall supervisor Les Snead and head coach Sean McVay have ever allowed perception to force their decision-making, nonetheless I appropriate don’t watch the direction to improvement in the instant time duration without Stafford.
The draft is a non-starter this year, between the Rams selecting No. 26 overall and the lack of high-finish quarterback capability. Free company is never gripping.
Or not it’s arduous to imagine the Rams ponying as a lot as pay Sam Darnold if they’re unwilling to attain the identical for Stafford. After Darnold, the wonderful choices available in March are both polarizing (Aaron Rodgers, Russell Wilson, per chance Kirk Cousins) or uninspiring (Justin Fields, Jameis Winston, Mac Jones, Daniel Jones). With picks like that on the finish of the board, it makes sense that folks are floating 33-year-ragged Jimmy Garoppolo, Stafford’s backup final year, as a imaginable bridge quarterback to a novel future.
My request is, who the hell wants to make a bridge to the future when the latest team would per chance well be one among the league’s handiest in 2025?
This may per chance all rating worthy more sense if the Rams had been tranquil paying the associated price for his or her aggressive intention toward that Sizable Bowl LVI championship, nonetheless they’re not. They’ve drafted like maniacs the previous three years, and their funds are in perfect shape. No person’s asserting the Rams have to push their chips in the trend they did several years ago, nonetheless here’s a team that’s able to get correct now.
Stafford’s age is a problem, and he’s battled injuries typically proper by intention of his time in L.A., nonetheless he makes the Rams a contender in 2025. That doesn’t feel as appropriate if or not it’s Garoppolo — or any of the opposite sensible picks — beneath center instead.
Money, as normal, is the well-known motivator here. Stafford has outplayed his latest deal, and his cap numbers are untenable. It makes sense if the Rams don’t need him to reset the quarterback market, nonetheless absolutely there is a number the two facets can agree on.
Stafford knows from trip the intention in which it feels to have gaudy profession earnings with none of the success to assert for it. Snead and McVay know the intention in which it feels to desperately need a QB who comes by intention of in the postseason.
All facets had larger mediate long and arduous about all that forward of a switch is made that doesn’t in truth work for both of them.
David Helman covers the NFL for FOX Sports activities and hosts the NFL on FOX podcast. He beforehand spent nine seasons masking the Cowboys for the team’s official web feature. In 2018, he won a regional Emmy for his role in producing “Dak Prescott: A Family Reunion” relating to the quarterback’s time at Mississippi Divulge. Apply him on Twitter at @davidhelman_ .
Favor big tales delivered correct to your inbox? Assemble or log in to your FOX Sports activities legend, apply leagues, groups and gamers to salvage a personalized newsletter day-to-day .
Rep more from National Football League Apply your favorites to rating info about games, news and more
